Research Process
Peptide Directory HQ follows a systematic approach to compiling peptide information. This page explains our methodology.
Information Gathering
Primary Sources
For each peptide, we review:
- Published peer-reviewed studies from scientific journals
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses when available
- Clinical trial registrations and results
- Regulatory agency documentation
Search Strategy
We search scientific databases including:
- PubMed / MEDLINE
- Google Scholar
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Relevant specialized databases
Search terms include peptide names, aliases, and related compound names.
Information Synthesis
Evidence Evaluation
We assess research quality based on:
- Study design (RCT, observational, preclinical)
- Sample size and statistical power
- Methodology rigor
- Replication by independent researchers
- Publication quality and peer review status
Synthesis Approach
We present information by:
- Distinguishing preclinical from clinical evidence
- Noting consistency or contradictions across studies
- Acknowledging limitations and uncertainties
- Avoiding over-interpretation of preliminary findings
Content Creation
Monograph Structure
Each peptide monograph follows a consistent structure to ensure comprehensive coverage:
- Overview and identification
- Proposed mechanisms from research
- Research contexts and study areas
- Dosage discussion (educational only, with disclaimers)
- Administration contexts in studies
- Safety considerations and uncertainties
- Legal and regulatory context
- Common misconceptions
- Frequently asked questions
- Related peptides
Quality Controls
Content undergoes:
- Accuracy verification against sources
- Language review for appropriate framing
- Consistency checks across related content
- Disclaimer and disclosure verification
Maintenance
Update Triggers
Content is updated when:
- Significant new research is published
- Errors are identified
- Regulatory status changes
- Scheduled review periods occur
Review Schedule
All content is reviewed on a rotating schedule to ensure information remains current. Last-updated dates reflect the most recent review.
Limitations
Our methodology has limitations:
- We cannot review every study ever published
- New research may emerge between updates
- Publication bias affects available literature
- We are not a substitute for expert consultation